United States v. Weems

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Weems. Read the opinion of the Court — 896 F.3d 104
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided July 25, 2018·No. 17-1059E·Errata

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 17-1059 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant,

v.

KENDALL ROSE, Defendant, Appellee.

No. 17-1064 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant,

IKE WEEMS, a/k/a True, Defendant, Appellee.

No. 17-1066 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant,

ANTHONY SABETTA, Defendant, Appellee.

No. 17-1067 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant,

ALBERTO RODRÍGUEZ, Defendant, Appellee.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court, issued on July 18, 2018, is amended as follows:

On page 5, note 1, line 1, replace "ADW" with "A/BDW"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Weems, (1st Cir. 2018).

United States v. Weems (United States v. Weems) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.