United States v. Webster

170 F. App'x 428
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Webster. Read the opinion of the Court — 500 F.3d 606
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided March 8, 2006·No. No. 03-4314·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Kevin Webster was sentenced for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(viii), possession of a gun in relation to a drug trafficking crime, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), and possession of a gun and bullets by a convicted felon, id. § 922(g)(1). He argued for the first time on appeal that the district court erred by applying the sentencing guidelines as mandatory. See United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). We remanded to ask whether the judge would [429]*429have imposed a lesser sentence had he known that the guidelines were advisory. See United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471, 483—84 (7th Cir.2005). The judge said yes, and therefore we VACATE Webster’s sentence and REMAND for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Webster, 170 F. App'x 428 (7th Cir. 2006).

170 F. App'x 428 (United States v. Webster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)