United States v. Webster

170 F. App'x 428
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedMarch 8, 2006
DocketNo. 03-4314
StatusPublished

This text of 170 F. App'x 428 (United States v. Webster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Webster, 170 F. App'x 428 (7th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

ORDER

Kevin Webster was sentenced for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(viii), possession of a gun in relation to a drug trafficking crime, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), and possession of a gun and bullets by a convicted felon, id. § 922(g)(1). He argued for the first time on appeal that the district court erred by applying the sentencing guidelines as mandatory. See United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). We remanded to ask whether the judge would [429]*429have imposed a lesser sentence had he known that the guidelines were advisory. See United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471, 483—84 (7th Cir.2005). The judge said yes, and therefore we VACATE Webster’s sentence and REMAND for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 F. App'x 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-webster-ca7-2006.