United States v. Webster

426 F.2d 289
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 18, 1970
DocketNos. 14322, 14324, 14398
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 426 F.2d 289 (United States v. Webster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Webster, 426 F.2d 289 (4th Cir. 1970).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The only question worthy of consideration is whether the search and seizure violated the fourth amendment, so that the evidence obtained should have been suppressed. The questioned search occurred prior to the effective date of Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752, 89 S.Ct. 2034, 23 L.Ed.2d 685 (1969). We have previously held Chi mel not to be retroactive in application. Porter v. Ashmore, 421 F.2d 1186 (4th Cir. 1970). Whether the search was reasonable is thus to be determined by application of the standards of United States v. Rabinowitz, 339 U.S. 56, 70 S.Ct. 430, 94 L.Ed. 653 (1950). Applying that standard we find no error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Gwinn
46 F. Supp. 2d 479 (S.D. West Virginia, 1999)
United States v. Daniel C. Mason
523 F.2d 1122 (D.C. Circuit, 1975)
Lykken v. Vavreck
366 F. Supp. 585 (D. Minnesota, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
426 F.2d 289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-webster-ca4-1970.