United States v. Webb

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 14, 2025·No. 24-11093·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 24-11093 Document: 47-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/14/2025

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 24-11093 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ August 14, 2025 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Daja Webb,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:24-CR-179-1 ______________________________

Before Elrod, Chief Judge, and Jones and Smith, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Daja Webb has moved for leave to withdraw and filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Webb did not file a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief, and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 24-11093 Document: 47-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/14/2025

No. 24-11093

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. The motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Webb, (5th Cir. 2025).

United States v. Webb (United States v. Webb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)