United States v. Webb
This text of 631 F. App'x 133 (United States v. Webb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ON REHEARING
James Thomas Webb appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for release pending appeal. We previously dismissed the appeal as moot. Webb has now filed a petition for panel rehearing. Upon review of the petition, we grant panel rehearing. On rehearing, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Webb, No. 5:12-cr-00301-D-l (E.D.N.C. filed July 30, 2015; entered July 31, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
631 F. App'x 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-webb-ca4-2016.