United States v. Weaver

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 1, 1998·No. 98-6239·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6239

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ALBERT LARRY WEAVER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CR-90-238-A, CA-97-750-AM)

Submitted: August 25, 1998 Decided: September 1, 1998

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cheryl Johns Sturm, Westtown, Pennsylvania, for Appellant. William Neil Hammerstrom, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Weaver, Nos. CR-90-238-A; CA-97-750-AM

(E.D. Va. Oct. 14, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Weaver, (4th Cir. 1998).

United States v. Weaver (United States v. Weaver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related