United States v. Wayman Otis Wilkes

449 F.2d 163
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedNovember 15, 1971
Docket26206_1
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 449 F.2d 163 (United States v. Wayman Otis Wilkes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Wayman Otis Wilkes, 449 F.2d 163 (9th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Wilkes appeals from his conviction in the District Court on eight counts of violating 21 U.S.C. § 331 (q) (2), (3), sale and possession for sale of depressant or stimulant drugs. His sole contention on appeal is that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel because of his trial counsel’s incorapetency.

Wilkes contends that his trial counsel might have presented the evidence differently and that he might have called other witnesses. This court has held that such hindsight speculation as to how a case might have been defended differently is not sufficient to show that trial counsel was incompetent. Borchert v. United States, 405 F.2d 735 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. den. 394 U.S. 972, 89 S.Ct. 1466, 22 L.Ed.2d 753 (1969). We have examined the record and conclude that counsel was rendering reasonably effective assistance. Therefore, the conviction must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Woodring v. United States
360 F. Supp. 240 (C.D. California, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
449 F.2d 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-wayman-otis-wilkes-ca9-1971.