United States v. Watts
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6829
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KEVIN ARNETTE WATTS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:04-cr-00086-RAJ-2)
Submitted: August 26, 2009 Decided: September 3, 2009
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin Arnette Watts, Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James Mitchell, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Kevin Arnette Watts appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for specific performance of his plea
agreement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See United States v. Watts, No. 2:04-cr-00086-
RAJ-2 (E.D. Va. Apr. 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Watts (United States v. Watts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.