United States v. Watson

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Watson

325 F. App'x 399

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Watson. Read the opinion of the Court — 191 F. App'x 326 →

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 28, 2009·No. 08-50984·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Treating this “petition for writ of prohibition” and “assertion of rights” as an appeal from summary judgment, we affirm the judgment of the district court. The appellants provide no support for their assertions that the district court lacked jurisdiction, that the district judge should have recused, or that they have any other *400 factual or legal basis for relief. AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM: *

Treating this “petition for writ of prohibition” and “assertion of rights” as an appeal from summary judgment, we affirm the judgment of the district court. The appellants provide no support for their assertions that the district court lacked jurisdiction, that the district judge should have recused, or that they have any other *400 factual or legal basis for relief. AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

United States v. Watson, 325 F. App'x 399 (5th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

325 F. App'x 399 (United States v. Watson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.