United States v. Watson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-8123
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CURTIS LEE WATSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:88-cr-00201-LMB-1)
Submitted: April 22, 2010 Decided: April 27, 2010
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Curtis Lee Watson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Curtis Lee Watson appeals the district court’s order
denying Watson’s petition to appear before the court. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Watson, No. 1:88-cr-00201-LMB-1 (E.D. Va. Nov. 6,
2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Watson (United States v. Watson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.