United States v. Watson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Watson. Read the opinion of the Court — 336 F. App'x 363
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 27, 2010·No. 09-8123·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8123

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CURTIS LEE WATSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:88-cr-00201-LMB-1)

Submitted: April 22, 2010 Decided: April 27, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis Lee Watson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Curtis Lee Watson appeals the district court’s order

denying Watson’s petition to appear before the court. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Watson, No. 1:88-cr-00201-LMB-1 (E.D. Va. Nov. 6,

2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Watson, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Watson (United States v. Watson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.