United States v. Watson

70 M.J. 269, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 608

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided July 19, 2011·No. No. 11-0523/MC·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

CCA 201000263. Review granted on the following issues:

I. WHETHER APPELLANT’S GUILTY PLEA TO FRAUDULENT ENLISTMENT WAS PROVIDENT.

II. WHETHER AN ARTICLE 134 CLAUSE 1 OR 2 SPECIFICATION THAT FAILS TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE EITHER POTENTIAL TERMINAL ELEMENT STATES AN OFFENSE UNDER THE SUPREME COURT’S HOLDINGS IN UNITED STATES v. RESENDIZ-PONCE AND RUSSELL v. UNITED STATES, AND THIS COURT’S RECENT OPINIONS IN MEDINA, MILLER, AND JONES.

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25 on Issue I only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CCA 201000263. Review granted on the following issues:

I. WHETHER APPELLANT’S GUILTY PLEA TO FRAUDULENT ENLISTMENT WAS PROVIDENT.

II. WHETHER AN ARTICLE 134 CLAUSE 1 OR 2 SPECIFICATION THAT FAILS TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE EITHER POTENTIAL TERMINAL ELEMENT STATES AN OFFENSE UNDER THE SUPREME COURT’S HOLDINGS IN UNITED STATES v. RESENDIZ-PONCE AND RUSSELL v. UNITED STATES, AND THIS COURT’S RECENT OPINIONS IN MEDINA, MILLER, AND JONES.

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25 on Issue I only.

United States v. Watson, 70 M.J. 269, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 608 (Ark. 2011).

Pincite

70 M.J. 269 (United States v. Watson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

United States v. Watson

71 M.J. 54 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2012)

Opinion

Related