United States v. Watlington
This text of 675 F. App'x 358 (United States v. Watlington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not-binding precedent in this circuit.
Daniel Watlington appeals the district court’s order denying his “Request for Nunc Pro Tunc Amendment for Addendum Presentence Report.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Watlington, No. 5:05-cr-00004-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 15, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this [359]*359court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
675 F. App'x 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-watlington-ca4-2017.