United States v. Watkins
Opinion
Counsel appointed to represent Hubert Glenn Watkins, Jr., on appeal has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Watkins has filed a response requesting the appointment of substitute counsel. Our independent review of the brief, Watkins’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities in this case, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The motion by Watkins for substitution of counsel is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir.1998).
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
157 F. App'x 765 (United States v. Watkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.