United States v. Watkins

157 F. App'x 765
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 14, 2005·No. No. 04-40012·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Counsel appointed to represent Hubert Glenn Watkins, Jr., on appeal has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Watkins has filed a response requesting the appointment of substitute counsel. Our independent review of the brief, Watkins’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities in this case, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The motion by Watkins for substitution of counsel is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir.1998).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Watkins, 157 F. App'x 765 (5th Cir. 2005).

157 F. App'x 765 (United States v. Watkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Krumnow
476 F.3d 294 (Fifth Circuit, 2007)
United States v. Farias
469 F.3d 393 (Fifth Circuit, 2006)