United States v. Washinsky

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided April 27, 2023·No. 2:22-cv-01803·Unknown

Opinion

United States Attorney District of Nevada Nevada Bar No. 7709 Assistant United States Attorney Nevada Bar No. 11985 501 Las Vegas Blvd. So., Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 702-388-6336 Lindsay.Ager@usdoj.gov Attorneys for the United States of America UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Case No. 2:22-cv-01803-APG-VCF United States of America, Plaintiff, United States’ Motion to Extend Time to Serve v. (Second Request) Richard Washinsky, M.D., Defendant. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), the United States respectfully requests a 60- day extension of time to serve process on defendant Richard Washinsky, M.D. The United States has attempted 13 times, across six addresses, to serve Dr. Washinsky personally, without success. The United States’ multiple attempts to locate and serve Dr. Washinsky equate to good cause for granting an extension. Accordingly, the Court should grant the United States’ motion. I. Background On October 27, 2022, the United States filed a complaint against Dr. Washinsky alleging violations of the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. § 801 et seq., and its implementing regulations, 21 C.F.R. § 1301 et seq. (Compl. (ECF No. 1).) Within a week of filing the complaint, on November 4, 2022, the United States attempted to serve Dr. Washinsky. (See Affidavit of Due Diligence (ECF No. 5-1).) After attempting service at five locations within ten weeks, the United States’ process server failed to locate and serve Dr. Washinsky. (Id. at 2.) In addition to the numerous attempts described above, the United States’ process server searched the county assessor, DMV, voter registration, and telephone directory for information relating to Dr. Washinsky. (Id.) Despite these efforts, the United States was unable to locate and serve Dr. Washinsky in Nevada. (Id.) Based on information that Dr. Washinsky might be residing in Fort Meyers, Florida, the United States requested its first service extension, which the Court granted. (Order (ECF No. 6).) The United States retained a process server in Fort Meyers, who attempted service two times at Dr. Washinsky’s brother’s house in Fort Meyers but was unable to serve Dr. Washinsky at that address. (See Verified Return of Non-Service, attached as Exhibit 1.) Dr. Washinsky’s brother informed the process server that Dr. Washinsky is now living in Fort Lauderdale, but the process server was unable to locate a potential address using a skip trace. (Id.) Dr. Washinsky’s brother also provided a telephone number for Dr. Washinsky. (Id.) The United States Attorney’s Office conducted additional open-source research for a potential address for Dr. Washinsky in Fort Lauderdale and was unable to locate one. (Decl. of Lindsay Ager, attached as Exhibit 2.) But the United States is continuing to monitor public databases for a new address in Fort Lauderdale or elsewhere. (Id.) II. Analysis A. Extension of Time to Serve Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), a defendant must be served within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). If the defendant is not served within the 90-day period, the plaintiff can ask the court to extend the time for service. Id. The court must extend the time for service if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure to serve the defendant within 90 days. Lemoge v. United States, 587 F.3d 1188, 1198 (9th Cir. 2009) (citing prior version of Rule 4(m) with a 120-day deadline); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Courts determine on a case-by-case basis whether the party attempting service has shown good cause. In re Sheehan, 253 F.3d 507, 512 (9th Cir. 2001). Generally, good cause is demonstrated “where a plaintiff has shown diligent efforts to effect service.” Signature Surgery Ctr. LLC v. Cel Servs. Grp., Inc., No. 2:21-CV-00215-JCM-EJY, 2022 WL 1432444, at *1 (D. Nev. Apr. 5, 2022). It is within the court’s discretion whether to extend the time for service. Lemoge, 587 F.3d at 1198. B. Given the United States’ diligence, there is good cause to extend the service deadline. The United States has been diligent in its attempts to serve Dr. Washinsky. Since filing the complaint, the United States has tried 13 times, across six different addresses, to locate and serve Dr. Washinsky in Las Vegas, Nevada, and Fort Meyers, Florida. The United States seeks additional time to attempt to pinpoint an address in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, where Dr. Washinsky’s brother stated Dr. Washinsky is living. Although a skip trace and other open-source research did not pinpoint a Fort Lauderdale address, it is possible the address is too new to be showing in public records. The United States has set up “alerts” in multiple databases and would like to continue to monitor those databases for a new address. The United States also monitors the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners’ website for updates to Dr. Washinsky’s public address, as he is a medical doctor with an active license in the State of Nevada. Additionally, the United States’ process server will attempt to contact Dr. Washinsky at the telephone number provided by Dr. Washinsky’s brother to determine if Dr. Washinsky will agree to meet the process server to accept service of process. III. Conclusion The United States’ multiple attempts to locate and serve Dr. Washinsky demonstrate good cause for an extension of the service deadline. Given its ongoing efforts to personally serve Dr. Washinsky, the United States respectfully requests that the Court grant its 60-day motion to extend the time limit for service from April 25, 2023, until June 26, 2023. Dated: April 25, 2023 JASON M. FRIERSON United States Attorney /s/ Lindsay Ager Assistant United States Attorney Index of Exhibits • Exhibit 1 Verified Return of Non-Service • Exhibit 2 Declaration of Lindsay Ager EXHIBIT 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Washinsky, (D. Nev. 2023).

United States v. Washinsky (United States v. Washinsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related