United States v. Washington

8 C.M.A. 494, 8 USCMA 494, 24 C.M.R. 304, 1957 CMA LEXIS 322
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Washington. Read the opinion of the Court — 9 C.M.A. 131
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided December 13, 1957·No. No. 10,369·Published

Opinions

Opinion of the Court

Homer Ferguson, Judge:

The accused’s unauthorized absence from his organization, terminated by apprehension, resulted in his subsequent conviction of desertion, in violation of Article 85, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 885. The accused pleaded guilty to the lesser included offense of absence without leave in violation of Article 86, of the Code, supra, 10 USC § 886. The conviction of desertion must be set aside. The instructions were erroneous and prejudicial. United States v Soccio, 8 USCMA 477, 24 CMR 287. The record is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for reference to a board of review. The board, in its discretion, may affirm the lesser offense of absence without leave and reassess the sentence, or it may .order a rehearing on the desertion charge.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Washington, 8 C.M.A. 494, 8 USCMA 494, 24 C.M.R. 304, 1957 CMA LEXIS 322 (cma 1957).

8 C.M.A. 494 (United States v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Soccio
8 C.M.A. 477 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1957)