United States v. Washington
141 F. App'x 675
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Washington. Read the opinion of the Court — 394 F.3d 1152 →
Opinion
[676]*676MEMORANDUM
The government and Larry Douglas Washington agree that a limited remand is appropriate. Therefore, we remand to the district court in accordance with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).
LIMITED REMAND.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Washington, 141 F. App'x 675 (9th Cir. 2005).
141 F. App'x 675 (United States v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Alfred Arnold Ameline
409 F.3d 1073 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)