United States v. Washington

651 F. App'x 268
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 7, 2016·No. No. 15-20226·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The attorney appointed to represent Tron Washington has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Washington has not filed a response.

During the pendency of this appeal, Washington completed the 14-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release and was released from custody. Because no additional term of supervised release was imposed, the instant appeal is moot. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7, 118 S.Ct. 978, 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998); United States v. Clark, 193 F.3d 845, 847-48 (5th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED as moot, and counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is DENIED as unnecessary.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Washington, 651 F. App'x 268 (5th Cir. 2016).

651 F. App'x 268 (United States v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Clark
193 F.3d 845 (Fifth Circuit, 1999)
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Spencer v. Kemna
523 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1998)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)