United States v. Washington

651 F. App'x 268
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 7, 2016
DocketNo. 15-20226
StatusPublished

This text of 651 F. App'x 268 (United States v. Washington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Washington, 651 F. App'x 268 (5th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The attorney appointed to represent Tron Washington has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Washington has not filed a response.

During the pendency of this appeal, Washington completed the 14-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release and was released from custody. Because no additional term of supervised release was imposed, the instant appeal is moot. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7, 118 S.Ct. 978, 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998); United States v. Clark, 193 F.3d 845, 847-48 (5th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED as moot, and counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is DENIED as unnecessary.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Clark
193 F.3d 845 (Fifth Circuit, 1999)
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Spencer v. Kemna
523 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1998)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
651 F. App'x 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-washington-ca5-2016.