United States v. Washington
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT November 17, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-30737 Clerk Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TIMOTHY TERRANCE WASHINGTON, also known as Big Tim,
Defendant-Appellant. -------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 1:04-CR-10003-1 -------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Timothy
Terrance Washington has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief
as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our
independent review of counsel’s brief, the record, and
Washington’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel
is excused from further responsibilities herein, the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED, and Washington’s motion for appointment of new counsel
is DENIED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Washington (United States v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.