United States v. Washington

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Washington. Read the opinion of the Court — 95 F. App'x 701
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 17, 2006·No. 05-30737·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT November 17, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-30737 Clerk Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TIMOTHY TERRANCE WASHINGTON, also known as Big Tim,

Defendant-Appellant. -------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 1:04-CR-10003-1 -------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Timothy

Terrance Washington has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief

as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our

independent review of counsel’s brief, the record, and

Washington’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue.

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel

is excused from further responsibilities herein, the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED, and Washington’s motion for appointment of new counsel

is DENIED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Washington, (5th Cir. 2006).

United States v. Washington (United States v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)