United States v. Washington

328 F. App'x 163
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Washington. Read the opinion of the Court — 498 F.3d 225
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 1, 2009·No. 09-6584·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6584

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

MARIO FANEAK WASHINGTON,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (1:04-cr-00063-LHT-1)

Submitted: June 22, 2009 Decided: July 1, 2009

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mario Faneak Washington, Appellant Pro Se. David Kenneth Davis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Mario Faneak Washington appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006)

motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Washington, No. 1:04-cr-00063-

LHT-1 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 26, 2009). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Washington, 328 F. App'x 163 (4th Cir. 2009).

328 F. App'x 163 (United States v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 3582
28 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)