United States v. Washington
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7738
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
HINES LESTER WASHINGTON, a/k/a Clean,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James H. Michael, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-94-27)
Submitted: April 17, 1997 Decided: April 29, 1997
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hines Lester Washington, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his
motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 35.
We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. United States v. Washington, No. CR-94-27 (W.D. Va. Oct. 24, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Washington (United States v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.