United States v. Warren Clinton
This text of 637 F. App'x 965 (United States v. Warren Clinton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Federal prisoner Warren- Daniel Clinton appeals the district court’s 1 order committing him for mental health care or treatment under 18 U.S.C. § 4245, Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.
There is no clear error in the district court’s conclusion that a preponderance of the evidence established that Clinton was in need of hospitalization for care or treatment. See 18 U.S.C. § 4245(d) (burden of proof); United States v. Bean, 373 F.3d 877, 879 (8th Cir.2004) (standard of review).
The judgment is affirmed, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable M. Douglas Hatpool, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable David P. Rush, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
637 F. App'x 965, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-warren-clinton-ca8-2016.