United States v. Warren
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Derrick Lamar Warren appeals his guilty plea conviction for one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Warren contends that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) is unconstitutional under the Commerce Clause in light of United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549, 115 S.Ct. 1624, 131 L.Ed.2d 626 (1995), United States v. Morrison, 529 U.S. 598, 120 S.Ct. 1740, 146 L.Ed.2d 658 (2000), and Jones v. United States, 529 U.S. 848, 120 S.Ct. 1904, 146 L.Ed.2d 902 (2000). As Warren concedes, however, this court’s rejection of that ar[578]*578gument in United States v. Jones, 231 F.3d 508, 514-15 (9th Cir.2000) is dispositive.1
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the [578]*578courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
10 F. App'x 577 (United States v. Warren) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.