United States v. Warrant
This text of 314 F. App'x 85 (United States v. Warrant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Shane Travis Warrant appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Warrant contends that the district court erred when it denied his motion to suppress because evidence obtained during a traffic stop was seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Warrant waived the right to appeal this issue when he entered an unconditional guilty plea. See United States v. Lopez-Armenta, 400 F.3d 1173, 1175 (9th Cir.2005).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
314 F. App'x 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-warrant-ca9-2009.