United States v. Warden
This text of United States v. Warden (United States v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Plaintiff, -against- 25 CIVIL 6172 (CS) JUDGMENT WARDEN, Defendant. wee K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated September 24, 2025, because Petitioner has not shown that he has exhausted his administrative remedies, his Petition is dismissed without prejudice as unexhausted. See United States v. Whaley, 148 F.3d 205, 207 (2d Cir. 1998) ("Although prisoners may seek judicial review of the BOP's sentencing determinations after exhausting their administrative remedies, the district court is without jurisdiction to compute sentencing credit if a prisoner does not challenge his sentence and has not sought administrative review."); accordingly, the case 1s closed. Dated: New York, New York September 25, 2025 TAMMI M. HELLWIG Clerkof Court BY: Mange DeputyClerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Warden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-warden-nysd-2025.