United States v. Ward

615 F. App'x 139
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 2, 2015
DocketNo. 15-6596
StatusPublished

This text of 615 F. App'x 139 (United States v. Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ward, 615 F. App'x 139 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jevon Anthony Ward appeals the district court’s order denying his self-styled “Motion for Court to Request that the United States Attorney Consider Exercising [its] Discretion by Withdrawing Additional 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) of Movant’s Conviction.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Ward, No. 5:02-er-00034-BO-l (E.D.N.C. Mar. 27, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Penalties
18 U.S.C. § 924(c)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
615 F. App'x 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ward-ca4-2015.