United States v. Ward
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6655
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
GEORGE ALLEN WARD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Newport News. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CR-94-70, CA-97-49-4)
Submitted: July 30, 1998 Decided: August 26, 1998
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Allen Ward, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying
his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-
pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Ward, Nos. CR-94-70; CA-97-49-4 (E.D. Va.
May 30, 1997, Jan. 14, Feb. 10, & Mar. 4, 1998). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Ward (United States v. Ward) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.