United States v. Ward

415 F.2d 1006
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 14, 1969
Docket13266_1
StatusPublished

This text of 415 F.2d 1006 (United States v. Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ward, 415 F.2d 1006 (4th Cir. 1969).

Opinion

415 F.2d 1006

UNITED STATES ex rel. HUNTINGTON PIPING, INC., a corporation, Appellee,
v.
T. A. WARD, Jr., dba Ward Construction Company, and the
Maryland Casualty Company, a corporation, Appellants.

No. 13266.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued Oct. 8, 1969.
Decided Oct. 14, 1969.

John F. Wood, Jr., Huntington, W. Va. (Jenkins, Schaub & Fenstermaker, Huntington, W. Va., on brief), for appellants.

James W. St. Clair, Huntington, W. Va. (Marshall, Harshbarger & St. Clair, Huntington, W. Va., on brief), for appellee.

Before SOBELOFF, BOREMAN and BRYAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This is a Miller Act case in which the jury returned a verdict in the amount of $8,463.34 in favor of the subcontractor.

After examination of the record and briefs and after hearing argument, we find no substantial error, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
415 F.2d 1006, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ward-ca4-1969.