United States v. Ward

Third Circuit

United States v. Ward

175 F.2d 556, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 2402

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided June 14, 1949·No. No. 9889·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On this appeal from his convictioii in the District Court' for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania the appellant contends that there was not sufficient evidence to justify his conviction,. and that the trial judge ■erred in the admission of certain evidence and in permitting the jury to infer criminal intent from the facts as proved. We have carefully examined these contentions in the light of the record and find them to be wholly without merit.

Accordingly the judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On this appeal from his convictioii in the District Court' for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania the appellant contends that there was not sufficient evidence to justify his conviction,. and that the trial judge ■erred in the admission of certain evidence and in permitting the jury to infer criminal intent from the facts as proved. We have carefully examined these contentions in the light of the record and find them to be wholly without merit.

Accordingly the judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

United States v. Ward, 175 F.2d 556, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 2402 (3d Cir. 1949).

Pincite

175 F.2d 556 (United States v. Ward) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related