United States v. Ward
74 M.J. 173, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 1167
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided December 8, 2014·No. No. 15-0059/NA·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
CCA 201400021. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue:
THE CONVENING AUTHORITY ISSUED AN INSTRUCTION THAT LIMITED COURT-MARTIAL MEMBER NOMINATIONS TO PERSONNEL ONLY IN THE PAY-GRADES BETWEEN E-7 AND 0-5. THE LOWER COURT FOUND THIS SYSTEMATIC EXCLUSION OF PERSONNEL TO BE ERROR, BUT HARMLESS. SHOULD THIS COURT [174] SET ASIDE APPELLANT’S CONVICTIONS BASED ON THE RATIONALE OF UNITED STATES v. KIRKLAND DUE TO THE UNRESOLVED APPEARANCE OF UNFAIRNESS?
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Ward, 74 M.J. 173, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 1167 (Ark. 2014).
74 M.J. 173 (United States v. Ward) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Ward
74 M.J. 225 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2015)