United States v. Wapnick
315 F.2d 96
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided March 27, 1963·No. No. 242, Docket 27537·Published·Cited by 10 cases
Opinion
The evidence here was quite sufficient and the case was fairly tried and properly presented to the jury. Hence we find no reversible error. Defendant Wapnick’s contention of double jeopardy is prima facie untenable in the light of United States v. Lanza, 260 U.S. 377, 43 S.Ct. 141, 67 L.Ed. 314, and Abbate v. United States, 359 U.S. 187, 79 S.Ct. 666, 3 L.Ed.2d 729.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Wapnick, 315 F.2d 96 (2d Cir. 1963).
315 F.2d 96 (United States v. Wapnick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Moeller
420 A.2d 1153 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1979)
Klein v. Murtagh
44 A.D.2d 465 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1974)
Wapnick v. United States
311 F. Supp. 183 (E.D. New York, 1969)
Crowder v. United States
294 F. Supp. 291 (E.D. Michigan, 1967)
United States v. Marvin Feinberg
383 F.2d 60 (Second Circuit, 1967)
Harold Wapnick v. United States
355 F.2d 136 (Second Circuit, 1966)
United States v. Harold Wapnick, James Lafazia, Charles Gersh, and David Brill
315 F.2d 96 (Second Circuit, 1963)