United States v. Wanis Koyomejian

957 F.2d 636, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1265, 92 Daily Journal DAR 2050, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 2000
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Wanis Koyomejian. Read the opinion of the Court — 946 F.2d 1450
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 12, 1992·No. 90-50218·Published

Opinion

957 F.2d 636

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Wanis KOYOMEJIAN; Raffi Kouyoumjian, Simon Kouyoumjian,
Agop Kouyoumjian, Ohanes Khawaloujian, Salim Chalhoub, Rita
Sorfazian, Dalida Avakian, Avedis Khawaloujian, Jimmy
Contreras, Raul Vivas, Hamayak Atayan, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-50218.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 12, 1992.

Mark J. Werksman, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

Howard L. Weitzman, Steve Cochran, David R. Fields, Katten Muchin Zavis & Weitzman, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellees Wanis Koyomejian and Simon Kouyoumjian.

Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, BROWNING, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, D.W. NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, TROTT, FERNANDEZ, RYMER, T.G. NELSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

Prior Report: 946 F.2d 1450.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Wanis Koyomejian, 957 F.2d 636, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1265, 92 Daily Journal DAR 2050, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 2000 (9th Cir. 1992).

957 F.2d 636 (United States v. Wanis Koyomejian) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.