United States v. Wanda Grother

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 1, 1999
Docket98-1759
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Wanda Grother (United States v. Wanda Grother) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Wanda Grother, (8th Cir. 1999).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________

No. 98-1759 ___________

United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. Wanda Grother, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. * ___________

Submitted: January 26, 1999 Filed: February 1, 1999 ___________

Before LOKEN, HEANEY, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Wanda Grother challenges the sentence imposed on her by the district court1 following her guilty plea to conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Upon the government’s motion for a downward departure under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5K1.1 (1998) and 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e), the district court granted a 20% departure from the bottom of the Guidelines range of 120-135 months, and sentenced Grother to 96 months imprisonment and 5 years supervised

1 The HONORABLE HAROLD D. VIETOR, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. release. On appeal Grother argues only that the district court abused its discretion by granting no more than a 20% departure. However, we may not review the extent of a district court’s downward departure under either section 5K1.1 or 3553(e). See United States v. Sharp, 931 F.2d 1310, 1311 (8th Cir. 1991); see also United States v. Dutcher, 8 F.3d 11, 12 (8th Cir.1993). Consistent with our prior order, we have reviewed the record for any nonfrivolous issues, and have found none. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988). Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)
United States v. Stanley Sharp
931 F.2d 1310 (Eighth Circuit, 1991)
United States v. Jerry Gene Dutcher
8 F.3d 11 (Eighth Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Wanda Grother, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-wanda-grother-ca8-1999.