United States v. Walter Robert Dickson

462 F.2d 184, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9035
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 13, 1972·No. 72-1141·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Walter Robert Dickson appeals his conviction for the interstate transportation of a falsely made and forged security in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2314. Finding no error we affirm.

The definition of a security in 18 U.S.C. § 2311 includes a document “transferring or assigning any right, title, or interest in or to goods, wares, and merchandise . . .’’On consideration of the briefs, record, and argument, we conclude that the district court properly ruled that this definition of a security embraced a “statement of source of title” of a motor vehicle and that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the judgment.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Walter Robert Dickson, 462 F.2d 184, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9035 (4th Cir. 1972).

462 F.2d 184 (United States v. Walter Robert Dickson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Hubbard
856 F. Supp. 1416 (E.D. California, 1994)
United States v. Castellano
610 F. Supp. 1359 (S.D. New York, 1985)
United States v. Raymond W. Zwego, Jr.
657 F.2d 248 (Tenth Circuit, 1981)
United States v. Elliott
571 F.2d 880 (Fifth Circuit, 1978)