United States v. Walker

230 F. App'x 467
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 12, 2007
Docket06-60683
StatusUnpublished

This text of 230 F. App'x 467 (United States v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Walker, 230 F. App'x 467 (5th Cir. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: 1

After reviewing the record and considering the briefs of the parties and argument of counsel we are satisfied that the district court did not err in finding that the Mayor of Biloxi declared a curfew that was in effect at the time the officers stopped the defendant on the streets of Biloxi. For that reason, the district court did not err in denying Walker’s motion to suppress. Accordingly the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

1

. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
230 F. App'x 467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-walker-ca5-2007.