United States v. Walker
This text of 230 F. App'x 467 (United States v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
After reviewing the record and considering the briefs of the parties and argument of counsel we are satisfied that the district court did not err in finding that the Mayor of Biloxi declared a curfew that was in effect at the time the officers stopped the defendant on the streets of Biloxi. For that reason, the district court did not err in denying Walker’s motion to suppress. Accordingly the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
230 F. App'x 467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-walker-ca5-2007.