United States v. Walker

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Walker

230 F. App'x 467

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Walker. Read the opinion of the Court — 410 F.3d 754 →

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 12, 2007·No. 06-60683·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: 1

After reviewing the record and considering the briefs of the parties and argument of counsel we are satisfied that the district court did not err in finding that the Mayor of Biloxi declared a curfew that was in effect at the time the officers stopped the defendant on the streets of Biloxi. For that reason, the district court did not err in denying Walker’s motion to suppress. Accordingly the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

1

. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM: 1

After reviewing the record and considering the briefs of the parties and argument of counsel we are satisfied that the district court did not err in finding that the Mayor of Biloxi declared a curfew that was in effect at the time the officers stopped the defendant on the streets of Biloxi. For that reason, the district court did not err in denying Walker’s motion to suppress. Accordingly the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

1

. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

United States v. Walker, 230 F. App'x 467 (5th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

230 F. App'x 467 (United States v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.