United States v. Walker

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Walker

604 F. App'x 275

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 22, 2015·No. No. 15-6477·Published

Opinion

[276] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Lamont Walker appeals the district court’s marginal order denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. See Bereano v. United States, 706 F.3d 568, 575 (4th Cir.2013) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[276] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Lamont Walker appeals the district court’s marginal order denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. See Bereano v. United States, 706 F.3d 568, 575 (4th Cir.2013) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Walker, 604 F. App'x 275 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

604 F. App'x 275 (United States v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related