United States v. Walker

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 9, 1996·No. 95-7639·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7639

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TYRONE RUSSELL WALKER, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-93-358-A, CA-95-548-AM)

Submitted: December 26, 1995 Decided: May 9, 1996

Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrone Russell Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Walker, Nos. CR-93-358-A; CA-95-548-AM (E.D. Va. Oct. 4, 1995). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Walker, (4th Cir. 1996).

United States v. Walker (United States v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related