United States v. Walker

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Walker

363 F. App'x 722

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedFebruary 1, 2010

DocketNo. 09-10645

StatusPublished

This text of 363 F. App'x 722 (United States v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Walker, 363 F. App'x 722 (11th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

William Charles Fletcher and Richard Selinger, appointed counsel for Andre Maurice Walker, have filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Walker’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

William Charles Fletcher and Richard Selinger, appointed counsel for Andre Maurice Walker, have filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Walker’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

363 F. App'x 722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-walker-ca11-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack