United States v. Walden

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Walden

206 F. App'x 300

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 20, 2006·No. 06-6574·Unpublished

Opinion

*301 PER CURIAM:

Jerome Walden appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions seeking a certificate of appealability and to hold his claims in abeyance. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Walden, No. 3:95-cr-00063-JRS (E.D. Va. Feb. 28, 2006; Mar. 21, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*301 PER CURIAM:

Jerome Walden appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions seeking a certificate of appealability and to hold his claims in abeyance. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Walden, No. 3:95-cr-00063-JRS (E.D. Va. Feb. 28, 2006; Mar. 21, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Walden, 206 F. App'x 300 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

206 F. App'x 300 (United States v. Walden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.