United States v. Wakefield

111 F. App'x 529
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 25, 2004·No. No. 04-30137; D.C. No. CR-03-02075-MRH·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Timothy G. Wakefield appeals the district court’s order affirming his conviction for operating a motor vehicle on a Forest Development Road without a valid driver’s license in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 261.54 and Forest Order No. 01-005. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

[530] Wakefield contends that the Forest Service does not have authority to create the prohibition that he violated nor to enforce it. This argument is without merit. The Forest Service regulation at issue is well within the scope of its authority. See 36 C.F.R. § 261.50 (stating the Forest Service supervisor may issue orders that restrict the use of described areas within its jurisdiction); cf. United States v. True, 946 F.2d 682, 683-84 (9th Cir.1991) (recognizing that the Forest Service Supervisor had authority to issue orders pursuant to 36 C.F.R. § 261.50).

Wakefield’s August 30, 2004 motion to correct the trial transcript and to grant additional time is denied.

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Wakefield, 111 F. App'x 529 (9th Cir. 2004).

111 F. App'x 529 (United States v. Wakefield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related