United States v. Wainwright

793 F. Supp. 2d 797, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139838, 2011 WL 2517013
District Court, E.D. Virginia·Decided June 17, 2011·No. Criminal 4:10cr16·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

REBECCA BEACH SMITH, District Judge.

This case comes before the court upon the court’s sua sponte order to show cause why the defendant’s conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1512(a)(1)(C) (“Section 1512”) should not be vacated. See Docket # 237. Both the government and the defendant have responded, see Docket # # 238, 239, agreeing with the court’s analysis of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Fowler v. United States, — U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 2045, 179 L.Ed.2d 1099 (2011), with the court’s conclusion that the jury was not properly instructed as to the necessary elements for conviction under Section 1512, and that as such the defendant’s conviction on Count Seven should be vacated. The court therefore VACATES and DISMISSES the defendant’s conviction as to Count Seven of the Second Superseding Indictment. Sentencing on the remaining counts of conviction remains set for July 22, 2011.

The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to defense counsel, the Assistant United States Attorney at Newport News, and the United States Probation Officer.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Wainwright, 793 F. Supp. 2d 797, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139838, 2011 WL 2517013 (E.D. Va. 2011).

793 F. Supp. 2d 797 (United States v. Wainwright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stapleton v. United States
886 F. Supp. 2d 542 (E.D. Virginia, 2012)