United States v. Waggoner
This text of 321 F. App'x 687 (United States v. Waggoner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Mickey Lee Waggoner appeals the fifteen-year sentence imposed following his [688]*688guilty plea to being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18. U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He contends that the district court erred in treating his two prior convictions for first degree burglary under Or.Rev.Stat. § 164.225 as violent felonies under the Armed Career Criminal Act. This contention is foreclosed by United States v. Mayer, 560 F.3d 948, 962-63 (9th Cir.2009) (holding that first degree burglary under § 164.225 is categorically a “violent felony” under the Act’s residual clause).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid[688]*688ed by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
321 F. App'x 687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-waggoner-ca9-2009.