United States v. Wade

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Wade

426 F. App'x 832

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedMay 17, 2011

DocketNo. 10-10820

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 426 F. App'x 832 (United States v. Wade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Wade, 426 F. App'x 832 (11th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Clyde M. Collins, Jr., appointed counsel for Isaiah Wade, in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Wade’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Clyde M. Collins, Jr., appointed counsel for Isaiah Wade, in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Wade’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

426 F. App'x 832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-wade-ca11-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack