United States v. Wade

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Wade

426 F. App'x 832

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided May 17, 2011·No. No. 10-10820·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Clyde M. Collins, Jr., appointed counsel for Isaiah Wade, in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Wade’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Clyde M. Collins, Jr., appointed counsel for Isaiah Wade, in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Wade’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Wade, 426 F. App'x 832 (11th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

426 F. App'x 832 (United States v. Wade) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related