United States v. Waco Wayne Criswell
This text of 336 F.2d 808 (United States v. Waco Wayne Criswell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
336 F.2d 808
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Waco Wayne CRISWELL, Appellant.
No. 9423.
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.
Argued Sept. 22, 1964.
Decided Sept. 29, 1964.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore; Harrison L. Winter, District Judge.
Frank W. Smith, Jr., Richmond, Va. (court-assigned counsel) (Tucker, Mays, Moore & Reed, Richmond, Va., on brief) for appellant.
Paul R. Kramer, Asst. U.S. Atty. (Thomas J. Kenney, U.S. Atty., on brief), for appellee.
Before BOREMAN and BRYAN, Circuit Judges, and SIMONS, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Upon study of the record in this case, we find no error in the trial. The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
336 F.2d 808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-waco-wayne-criswell-ca4-1964.