United States v. W. D. Eastland and Wife, Myrtle Eastland, Noema E. Cook and G. M. Smith and Wife, Emmabell Smith

Fifth Circuit

United States v. W. D. Eastland and Wife, Myrtle Eastland, Noema E. Cook and G. M. Smith and Wife, Emmabell Smith

199 F.2d 956, 42 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 899, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3474

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedNovember 25, 1952

Docket14006_1

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 199 F.2d 956 (United States v. W. D. Eastland and Wife, Myrtle Eastland, Noema E. Cook and G. M. Smith and Wife, Emmabell Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. W. D. Eastland and Wife, Myrtle Eastland, Noema E. Cook and G. M. Smith and Wife, Emmabell Smith, 199 F.2d 956, 42 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 899, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3474 (5th Cir. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

199 F.2d 956

UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
W. D. EASTLAND and wife, Myrtle Eastland, Noema E. Cook and G. M. Smith and wife, Emmabell Smith, Appellees.

No. 14006.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

November 25, 1952.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas; Ben H. Rice, Jr., Judge.

Chas. F. Herring, U. S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., Charles S. Lyon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept. of Justice, Ellis N. Slack, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., Morton K. Rothschild, S. Dee Hanson, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Dorothy Ann Kinney, Amarillo, Tex., for appellees.

Before HOLMES, RUSSELL and STRUM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgments in these consolidated cases, D.C., 103 F.Supp. 182, are reversed, and judgment rendered here for the United States, upon the authority of Arrowsmith v. Commissioner, 73 S.Ct. 71.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI