United States v. Vytautas Gecas

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Vytautas Gecas

81 F.3d 1032, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 7547, 1996 WL 168608

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedApril 11, 1996

Docket93-3291

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 81 F.3d 1032 (United States v. Vytautas Gecas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Vytautas Gecas, 81 F.3d 1032, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 7547, 1996 WL 168608 (11th Cir. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, and KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI