United States v. Vladimir Rodriguez
406 F.3d 1261, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 6629, 2005 WL 895174
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided April 19, 2005·No. 04-12676·Published·Cited by 17 cases
Opinions
ORDER:
The Court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the Court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular-active service not having voted in favor of it (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Eleventh Circuit Rule 35-5), rehearing en banc is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Vladimir Rodriguez, 406 F.3d 1261, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 6629, 2005 WL 895174 (11th Cir. 2005).
406 F.3d 1261 (United States v. Vladimir Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Pineiro
Fifth Circuit, 2005
United States v. Keothavy Tai-Ourane
137 F. App'x 218 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Maranda Starr Davis
135 F. App'x 281 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Carlos Israel Cosme
134 F. App'x 391 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Rogers Lee Jackson
134 F. App'x 387 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Sergio Ortiz Alcantar
134 F. App'x 401 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Samuel Valiant Shannahan, III
135 F. App'x 253 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
United States v. David O. Edwards
134 F. App'x 352 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Edward Anthony Collier
140 F. App'x 42 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Fred Wade
134 F. App'x 347 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Malcolm Pritchett
135 F. App'x 216 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Philip Wayne Mathenia
409 F.3d 1289 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Francisco D. Pineiro, Also Known as Frank Pineiro
410 F.3d 282 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Mitchell Jackson Seale, III
132 F. App'x 244 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Dianne L. Dyson
132 F. App'x 247 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Hanri Rasean Ingraham
130 F. App'x 395 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)