United States v. Vitarius

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Vitarius

616 F. App'x 401

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided September 18, 2015·No. No. 14-15511·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

W. Scott Brower, appointed counsel for Patrick Joseph Vitarás, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent review of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Vitarius’s revocation of release and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

W. Scott Brower, appointed counsel for Patrick Joseph Vitarás, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent review of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Vitarius’s revocation of release and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Vitarius, 616 F. App'x 401 (11th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

616 F. App'x 401 (United States v. Vitarius) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related