United States v. Virgil Ross Manning
This text of 478 F.2d 1380 (United States v. Virgil Ross Manning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Virgil Ross Manning, a member of the Jehovah’s Witness religion and a conscientious objector, was indicted and convicted for failing to perform civilian work as ordered by his local draft board. On appeal he asserts that § 456(j) of the Military Selective Service Act of 1967, 50 U.S.C.App. is unconstitutional in that Congress is exercising a power to conscript a civilian rather than a military work force when it orders a conscientious objector to perform compulsory civilian employment in lieu of being inducted into the Armed Forces.
There is no absolute right to an exemption from military service. The right exists only because Congress has seen fit to create it and Congress has the right to condition its exemption by requiring alternative service. United States v. Crouch, 415 F.2d 425 (5th Cir., 1969); O’Connor v. United States, 415 F.2d 1110 (9th Cir. 1969), and cases cited therein.
Finding appellant’s remaining contentions without merit, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
478 F.2d 1380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-virgil-ross-manning-ca5-1973.