United States v. Virgil Johnson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7394
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
VIRGIL LAMONTE JOHNSON, a/k/a Ghetto,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:12-cr-00850-CMC-3; 3:16-cv-02226-CMC)
Submitted: February 28, 2017 Decided: March 3, 2017
Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Virgil Lamonte Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. William Kenneth Witherspoon, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Virgil Lamonte Johnson appeals the district court’s order
denying his motions for plain error review and for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
appealability and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by
the district court. United States v. Johnson, Nos. 3:12-cr-
00850-CMC-3; 3:16-cv-02226-CMC (D.S.C. Sept. 12 & 30, 2016). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Virgil Johnson (United States v. Virgil Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.