United States v. Virgil Johnson

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 3, 2017·No. 16-7394·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7394

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

VIRGIL LAMONTE JOHNSON, a/k/a Ghetto,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:12-cr-00850-CMC-3; 3:16-cv-02226-CMC)

Submitted: February 28, 2017 Decided: March 3, 2017

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Virgil Lamonte Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. William Kenneth Witherspoon, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Virgil Lamonte Johnson appeals the district court’s order

denying his motions for plain error review and for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by

the district court. United States v. Johnson, Nos. 3:12-cr-

00850-CMC-3; 3:16-cv-02226-CMC (D.S.C. Sept. 12 & 30, 2016). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Virgil Johnson, (4th Cir. 2017).

United States v. Virgil Johnson (United States v. Virgil Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.