United States v. Vincent Malicek
This text of 402 F. App'x 232 (United States v. Vincent Malicek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM ***
Vincent Malicek appeals his conviction for armed robbery. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Evidence of Malicek’s unemployment, poor financial circumstances, child support arrearages, and failure to pay for drug testing was properly admitted to show a sudden and unexplained change in Malicek’s financial circumstances in the days surrounding the robbery. United States v. Mitchell, 172 F.3d 1104, 1109 (9th Cir. 1999); see also United States v. Jackson, 882 F.2d 1444, 1450 (9th Cir.1989).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
402 F. App'x 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-vincent-malicek-ca9-2010.