United States v. Vincent Malicek

402 F. App'x 232
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedNovember 1, 2010
Docket09-50139
StatusUnpublished

This text of 402 F. App'x 232 (United States v. Vincent Malicek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Vincent Malicek, 402 F. App'x 232 (9th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Vincent Malicek appeals his conviction for armed robbery. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Evidence of Malicek’s unemployment, poor financial circumstances, child support arrearages, and failure to pay for drug testing was properly admitted to show a sudden and unexplained change in Malicek’s financial circumstances in the days surrounding the robbery. United States v. Mitchell, 172 F.3d 1104, 1109 (9th Cir. 1999); see also United States v. Jackson, 882 F.2d 1444, 1450 (9th Cir.1989).

AFFIRMED.

***

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. MacDonald Julius Jackson
882 F.2d 1444 (Ninth Circuit, 1989)
United States v. Mitchell
172 F.3d 1104 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
402 F. App'x 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-vincent-malicek-ca9-2010.